<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div>Hi Albert,<br><br></div>I am observing some issue related to SMR.<br></div>In my setup, I am having 2 eid's(<a href="http://4.4.4.0/24">4.4.4.0/24</a>, <a href="http://2.2.2.0/24">2.2.2.0/24</a>) registered to MS via XTR1, using netconf interface I am deleting one eid (<a href="http://2.2.2.0/24">2.2.2.0/24</a>) after delete, XTR1 is not sending SMR to its cached entries (map_cache).<br></div>As per my understanding, It suppose to send SMR for <a href="http://2.2.2.0/24">2.2.2.0/24</a> to ITR (XTR3)<br><div><div><div>Please correct me, If i am wrong.<br><br>Debug logs on XTR1<br><br>[2016/12/26 15:54:56] DEBUG: Start SMR for local EID <a href="http://4.4.4.0/24">4.4.4.0/24</a><br>[2016/12/26 15:54:56] DEBUG: Sending SMRs to PITRs<br>[2016/12/26 15:54:56] DEBUG-3: LMAPI: Ready to send 12 bytes through API socket<br><br></div><div>code pointer:<br><br> OOR_LOG(LDBG_1, "Start SMR for local EID %s", lisp_addr_to_char(eid));<br><br> /* TODO: spec says SMRs should be sent only to peer ITRs that sent us<br> * traffic in the last minute. Should change this in the future*/<br> /* XXX: works ONLY with IP */<br> mcache_foreach_active_entry_in_ip_eid_db(xtr->map_cache, eid, mce) {<br> mcache_map = mcache_entry_mapping(mce);<br> build_and_send_smr_mreq_to_map(xtr, map, mcache_map);<br> } mcache_foreach_active_entry_in_ip_eid_db_end;<br><br> /* SMR proxy-itr */<br> OOR_LOG(LDBG_1, "Sending SMRs to PITRs");<br><br></div><div><br>commit 361e6c532291ffe487afd028ea8a7120020d3232<br>Author: albert-lopez <<a href="mailto:alopez@ac.upc.edu">alopez@ac.upc.edu</a>><br>Date: Wed Nov 30 17:48:03 2016 +0100<br><br> SMR changes of a local mapping modified by netconf<br><br></div><div>Thanks<br></div><div>Nagesh<br></div><div><div><br><div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 9:34 PM, Albert López <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:alopez@ac.upc.edu" target="_blank">alopez@ac.upc.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="gmail-m_-1995015332461730973moz-cite-prefix">Yes it should. Do you have detected
anything strange?<br>
<br>
Regards<span class="gmail-HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
Albert</font></span><div><div class="gmail-h5"><br>
<br>
On 09/11/16 16:53, Nagesh L wrote:<br>
</div></div></div><div><div class="gmail-h5">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Hi Alberto,<br>
</div>
<br>
Thank you for providing the netopeer-configuration
settings.<br>
</div>
Eid registration via XTR netconf interface is working on
my setup.<br>
<br>
</div>
one more question on LISP, SMR functionality working in
lismmob/oor?<br>
<br>
</div>
Thanks<br>
</div>
Nagesh <br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:16 PM,
Alberto Rodriguez-Natal <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rodrigueznatal@gmail.com" target="_blank">rodrigueznatal@gmail.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>Hi Nagesh,<br>
<br>
Try to allow complete access to all users. Run "sudo
netopeer-configurator" and go to the NACM section.
Change the settings to look like the ones below.
<pre class="gmail-m_-1995015332461730973m_-6062327040466525236gmail-aLF-aPX-K0-aPE gmail-m_-1995015332461730973m_-6062327040466525236gmail-aLF-aPX-aLK-ayr-auR">│Netopeer ││Access control is OFF │
│Intercommunication ││Using system groups is ALLOWED │
│NACM ││ │
│ ││Default action for read requests: PERMIT │
│ ││Default action for write requests: PERMIT │
│ ││Default action for execute requests: PERMIT │
│ ││ │
│ ││Add users with unlimited access │
│ ││ alberto (your ussername here) │
│ ││
</pre>
You can try to take a look here as well<br>
<br>
<a href="https://github.com/CESNET/netopeer/wiki/AccessControl" target="_blank">https://github.com/CESNET/neto<wbr>peer/wiki/AccessControl</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
Let us know if that solves the issue.<br>
<br>
</div>
Thanks!<span class="gmail-m_-1995015332461730973HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
</font></span></div>
<span class="gmail-m_-1995015332461730973HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Alberto<br>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>