[OOR-Users] xTR mode with NAT Traversal | non-icml traffic issue's --> assistance needed
Albert López
alopez at ac.upc.edu
Fri Sep 23 09:44:08 CEST 2016
Dear Niek,
Are you using more than one xTR/MN connected behind the same NAT? NAT
support is in experimental status and the current implementation of the
control plane (MS / RTRs) only supports one xTR behind the same NAT.
Have you tried to use another DNS?
Best regards
Albert
On 22/09/16 14:21, Niek van der Ven wrote:
> Hi,
> Currently trying to get the xTR mode working with NAT Traversal but i
> have issues with non icmp traffic for both in and out-bound.
>
> The icmp for both in and outbound is working on ipv4, also the
> registration appears to be fine (153.16.57.130 on a Linux machine
> connected via a dedicated Vnic):
>
> niek-xtr intouch-ams-mr-ms-1 yes yes 00:10:00 0 153.16.57.128/28
> 10.1.1.145 (down)
> 158.38.1.92 (up) 158.38.1.92
>
>
> Can somebody help me with a “Working” config so i can compare and find
> the error in my setup?
>
> Running Ubuntu Linux 14.04.4
> Open Overlay Router v1.1 compiled for Linux
>
>
> Many thanx in advance for the support!!!
>
> The testing results, config and debug info is below:
>
> ###############
> netstat -nr
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface
> 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0
> 0 eth0
> 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0
> eth0
> 153.16.57.128 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0
> eth1
>
> route
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
> default fw01.nalwventur 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0
> eth0
> 10.1.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
> 153.16.57.128 * 255.255.255.240 U 0 0 0 eth1
>
>
> ip rule list
> 0:from all lookup local
> 2:from 10.1.1.145 lookup 2
> 99:from all to 153.16.57.128/28 lookup main
> 100:from 153.16.57.128/28 lookup 100
> 32766:from all lookup main
> 32767:from all lookup default
>
> ip route show table 100
> default dev lispTun0 proto static metric 100
>
> ip route show table 99
>
> ip route show table 2
> default via 10.1.1.1 dev eth0 proto static metric 100
>
>
> ip route show table 0
> default via 10.1.1.1 dev eth0 table 2 proto static metric 100
> default dev lispTun0 table 100 proto static metric 100
> default via 10.1.1.1 dev eth0
> 10.1.1.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 10.1.1.145
> 153.16.57.128/28 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 153.16.57.129
> broadcast 10.1.1.0 dev eth0 table local proto kernel scope link
> src 10.1.1.145
> local 10.1.1.145 dev eth0 table local proto kernel scope host src
> 10.1.1.145
> broadcast 10.1.1.255 dev eth0 table local proto kernel scope link
> src 10.1.1.145
> broadcast 127.0.0.0 dev lo table local proto kernel scope link src
> 127.0.0.1
> local 127.0.0.0/8 dev lo table local proto kernel scope host src
> 127.0.0.1
> local 127.0.0.1 dev lo table local proto kernel scope host src
> 127.0.0.1
> broadcast 127.255.255.255 dev lo table local proto kernel scope
> link src 127.0.0.1
> broadcast 153.16.57.128 dev eth1 table local proto kernel scope
> link src 153.16.57.129
> local 153.16.57.129 dev eth1 table local proto kernel scope host
> src 153.16.57.129
> broadcast 153.16.57.143 dev eth1 table local proto kernel scope
> link src 153.16.57.129
> default dev lispTun0 table 100 proto static metric 100
> unreachable default dev lo table unspec proto kernel metric
> 4294967295 error -101
> fe80::/64 dev eth1 proto kernel metric 256
> fe80::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256
> unreachable default dev lo table unspec proto kernel metric
> 4294967295 error -101
> local ::1 dev lo table local proto none metric 0
> local fe80:: dev lo table local proto none metric 0
> local fe80:: dev lo table local proto none metric 0
> local fe80::4026:a1ff:fe58:94da dev lo table local proto none metric 0
> local fe80::9029:52ff:fea7:9b88 dev lo table local proto none metric 0
> ff00::/8 dev eth1 table local metric 256
> ff00::/8 dev eth0 table local metric 256
> unreachable default dev lo table unspec proto kernel metric
> 4294967295 error -101
>
> ip route show table 32766
>
> ip route show table 32767
>
>
> ########################
> Ping to google dns ok:
> ########################
> ping 8.8.8.8
> PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=43 time=50.5 ms
> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=43 time=49.1 ms
> ^C
> --- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
> 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 49.181/49.885/50.590/0.739 ms
>
> 11:51:43.050728 IP 153.16.57.130 > google-public-dns-a.google.com
> <http://google-public-dns-a.google.com>: ICMP echo request, id 23371,
> seq 2, length 64
> 11:51:43.099555 IP google-public-dns-a.google.com
> <http://google-public-dns-a.google.com> > 153.16.57.130: ICMP echo
> reply, id 23371, seq 2, length 64
>
> ########################
> Ping to nu.nl <http://nu.nl> not ok:
> ########################
> ping nu.nl <http://nu.nl>
> ^C
>
> 11:51:45.762500 IP 153.16.57.130.51762 >
> resolver2-fs.opendns.com.domain: 7138+ A? nu.nl <http://nu.nl>. (23)
> ########################
> ! Ping to ip of nu.nl <http://nu.nl> (174.129.25.170) ok:
> ########################
> ping 174.129.25.170
> PING 174.129.25.170 (174.129.25.170) 56(84) bytes of data.
> 64 bytes from 174.129.25.170: icmp_seq=1 ttl=24 time=151 ms
> 64 bytes from 174.129.25.170: icmp_seq=2 ttl=24 time=151 ms
> ^C
> --- 174.129.25.170 ping statistics ---
> 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms
> rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 151.331/151.424/151.518/0.400 ms
>
> 11:52:04.737695 IP 153.16.57.130 > wwwizer.com <http://wwwizer.com>:
> ICMP echo request, id 23374, seq 2, length 64
> 11:52:04.888827 IP wwwizer.com <http://wwwizer.com> > 153.16.57.130:
> ICMP echo reply, id 23374, seq 2, length 64
>
>
> ##############
> Lisp debug level 3:
> #####################
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Received EID 153.16.57.130 ->
> 8.8.8.8, Proto: 1, Port: 0 -> 0
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-3: select_locs_from_maps: EID:
> 153.16.57.130 -> 8.8.8.8, protocol: 1, port: 0 -> 0 --> RLOC:
> 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-3: ttable_insert: Inserted tupla: Src_addr:
> 153.16.57.130, Dst addr: 8.8.8.8, Proto: ICMP, Src Port: 0, Dst Port:
> 0 IID|VNI: 0
>
>
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Sending encapsulated packet:
> RLOC 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
>
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 8.8.8.8 ->
> 153.16.57.130
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG: *ECM* -> flags:s, inner IP: 10.1.1.145 ->
> 217.8.98.42, inner UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG: *Map-Register* -> flags:PIRM record-count:
> 1 nonce f0ffdd6f5ffffffe, Inner IP: 10.1.1.145 -> 217.8.98.42, EID:
> 153.16.57.128/28, RTR: 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 10.1.1.145 ->
> 158.38.1.92 UDP: 4341 -> 4342
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG: Sent Encap Map-Register for mapping
> 153.16.57.128/28 to MS 217.8.98.42 from RLOC 10.1.1.145 through RTR
> 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 158.38.1.92 ->
> 10.1.1.145
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG: Received *Map-Notify*-> flags:IR,
> record-count: 1, nonce F0FFDD6F5FFFFFFE, IP: 158.38.1.92 ->
> 10.1.1.145, UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG: Received Data Map Notify
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG: Mapping-record -> ttl: 10 loc-count: 2
> action: no-action auth: 0 map-version: 0 eid: 153.16.57.128/28
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG: Locator-record -> flags: L=0,p=0,R=0,
> p/w: 0/0 255/0, addr: 10.1.1.145
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG: Locator-record -> flags: L=0,p=0,R=1,
> p/w: 1/100 255/0, addr: 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-2: mapping_get_locators_with_afi: List for
> OOR AFI 1 and afi 2 not yet created
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-2: mapping_add_locator: Added locator
> 158.38.1.92 to the mapping with EID 153.16.57.128/28.
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-2: mapping_add_locator: Added locator
> 10.1.1.145 to the mapping with EID 153.16.57.128/28.
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG: Map-Notify message confirms correct
> registration of 153.16.57.128/28.Programing next Map-Register in 60
> seconds
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-3: xTR: Completed processing of LISP
> control message
> [2016/9/22 11:51:42] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 93.174.93.164 ->
> 153.16.57.137
> [2016/9/22 11:51:43] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Received EID 153.16.57.130 ->
> 8.8.8.8, Proto: 1, Port: 0 -> 0
> [2016/9/22 11:51:43] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Sending encapsulated packet:
> RLOC 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
>
> [2016/9/22 11:51:43] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 8.8.8.8 ->
> 153.16.57.130
> [2016/9/22 11:51:43] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 93.174.93.164 ->
> 153.16.57.136
> [2016/9/22 11:51:45] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Received EID 153.16.57.130 ->
> 208.67.220.123, Proto: 17, Port: 51762 -> 53
> [2016/9/22 11:51:45] DEBUG-3: select_locs_from_maps: EID:
> 153.16.57.130 -> 208.67.220.123, protocol: 17, port: 51762 -> 53
> --> RLOC: 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 11:51:45] DEBUG-3: ttable_insert: Inserted tupla: Src_addr:
> 153.16.57.130, Dst addr: 208.67.220.123, Proto: UDP, Src Port: 51762,
> Dst Port: 53 IID|VNI: 0
>
>
> [2016/9/22 11:51:45] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Sending encapsulated packet:
> RLOC 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
>
> [2016/9/22 11:51:45] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 93.174.93.164 ->
> 153.16.57.132
> [2016/9/22 11:51:50] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Received EID 153.16.57.130 ->
> 208.67.222.123, Proto: 17, Port: 57620 -> 53
> [2016/9/22 11:51:50] DEBUG-3: select_locs_from_maps: EID:
> 153.16.57.130 -> 208.67.222.123, protocol: 17, port: 57620 -> 53
> --> RLOC: 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 11:51:50] DEBUG-3: ttable_insert: Inserted tupla: Src_addr:
> 153.16.57.130, Dst addr: 208.67.222.123, Proto: UDP, Src Port: 57620,
> Dst Port: 53 IID|VNI: 0
>
>
> [2016/9/22 11:51:50] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Sending encapsulated packet:
> RLOC 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
>
> [2016/9/22 11:51:52] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 77.252.153.82 ->
> 153.16.57.139
> [2016/9/22 11:51:55] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Received EID 153.16.57.130 ->
> 208.67.220.123, Proto: 17, Port: 51762 -> 53
> [2016/9/22 11:51:55] DEBUG-3: ttable_remove_with_khiter: Remove tupla:
> Src_addr: 153.16.57.130, Dst addr: 208.67.220.123, Proto: UDP, Src
> Port: 51762, Dst Port: 53 IID|VNI: 0
>
>
> [2016/9/22 11:51:55] DEBUG-3: select_locs_from_maps: EID:
> 153.16.57.130 -> 208.67.220.123, protocol: 17, port: 51762 -> 53
> --> RLOC: 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 11:51:55] DEBUG-3: ttable_insert: Inserted tupla: Src_addr:
> 153.16.57.130, Dst addr: 208.67.220.123, Proto: UDP, Src Port: 51762,
> Dst Port: 53 IID|VNI: 0
>
>
> [2016/9/22 11:51:55] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Sending encapsulated packet:
> RLOC 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
>
> [2016/9/22 11:51:59] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 93.174.93.164 ->
> 153.16.57.140
> [2016/9/22 11:52:2] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 93.174.93.164 ->
> 153.16.57.135
> [2016/9/22 11:52:3] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Received EID 153.16.57.130 ->
> 174.129.25.170, Proto: 1, Port: 0 -> 0
> [2016/9/22 11:52:3] DEBUG-3: select_locs_from_maps: EID: 153.16.57.130
> -> 174.129.25.170, protocol: 1, port: 0 -> 0
> --> RLOC: 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 11:52:3] DEBUG-3: ttable_insert: Inserted tupla: Src_addr:
> 153.16.57.130, Dst addr: 174.129.25.170, Proto: ICMP, Src Port: 0, Dst
> Port: 0 IID|VNI: 0
>
>
> [2016/9/22 11:52:3] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Sending encapsulated packet: RLOC
> 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
>
> [2016/9/22 11:52:3] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 174.129.25.170 ->
> 153.16.57.130
> [2016/9/22 11:52:4] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Received EID 153.16.57.130 ->
> 174.129.25.170, Proto: 1, Port: 0 -> 0
> [2016/9/22 11:52:4] DEBUG-3: OUTPUT: Sending encapsulated packet: RLOC
> 10.1.1.145 -> 158.38.1.92
>
> [2016/9/22 11:52:4] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 174.129.25.170 ->
> 153.16.57.130
> [2016/9/22 11:52:4] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 104.20.2.47 ->
> 153.16.57.135
> ^C[2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG: Terminal interrupt. Cleaning up...
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG-2: Exit Cleanup
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG: del_rule: Removed rule for source routing
> of src addr: 153.16.57.128/28
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG: del_rule: Removed rule for source routing
> of src addr: _NULL_
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG: xTR device destroyed
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG: Freed xTR ...
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG: Lisp controler destroyed
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG: del_route: deleted route from the system:
> src addr: -, dst prefix:-, gw: 10.1.1.1, table: 2
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG: del_rule: Removed rule for source routing
> of src addr: 10.1.1.145
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG: Sockets closed
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] DEBUG: Destroying lmtimers ...
> [2016/9/22 11:52:11] INFO: Exiting ...
>
>
>
>
> ###############
> Lisp config:
> ################
> niekvanderven at niek-xtr:~$ cat /etc/oor.conf
> debug = 3
> map-request-retries = 3
> log-file = /var/log/oor.log
> operating-mode = xTR
> # For the rest of this file you can delete the sections that does not
> apply to
> # the LISP device selected in operating-mode
> ###############################################
> #
> # Tunnel Router general configuration
> # Common for xTR, RTR & MN
> # encapsulation: Encapsulation that will use OOR in the data plane.
> Could be
> # LISP or VXLAN-GPE. LISP is selected by default
> encapsulation = LISP
> # RLOC probing configuration
> # rloc-probe-interval: interval at which periodic RLOC probes are sent
> # (seconds). A value of 0 disables RLOC probing
> # rloc-probe-retries: RLOC probe retries before setting the locator with
> # status down. [0..5]
> # rloc-probe-retries-interval: interval at which RLOC probes retries are
> # sent (seconds) [1..rloc-probe-interval]
>
> rloc-probing {
> rloc-probe-interval = 30
> rloc-probe-retries = 2
> rloc-probe-retries-interval = 5
> }
> map-resolver = {
> 217.8.98.42
> }
> ###############################################
> #
> # xTR & MN configuration
> #
>
> # NAT Traversl configuration.
> # nat_traversal_support: check if the node is behind NAT.
>
> nat_traversal_support = on
>
> # Map-Registers are sent to this Map-Server
> # You can define several Map-Servers. Map-Register messages will be
> sent to all
> # of them.
> # address: IPv4 or IPv6 address of the map-server
> # key-type: Only 1 supported (HMAC-SHA-1-96)
> # key: password to authenticate with the map-server
> # proxy-reply [on/off]: Configure map-server to Map-Reply on behalf
> of the xTR
> # Only one map-server supported in NAT mode! (193.162.145.50 not
> replying !)
> #map-server {
> # address = 193.162.145.50
> # key-type = 1
> # key = <ommitted>
> # proxy-reply = on
> #}
> map-server {
> address = 217.8.98.42
> key-type = 1
> key = <ommitted>
> proxy-reply = on
> }
> #map-server {
> # address = 217.8.98.46
> # key-type = 1
> # key = <ommitted>
> # proxy-reply = on
> # }
> # Packets addressed to non-LISP sites will be encapsulated to this
> Proxy-ETR
> # You can define several Proxy-ETR. Traffic will be balanced according
> to the
> # priority and weight.
> # address: IPv4 or IPv6 address of the Proxy-ETR
> # priority [0-255]: Proxy-ETR with lower values are more preferable.
> # weight [0-255]: When priorities are the same for multiple Proxy-ETRs,
> # the weight indicates how to balance unicast traffic between them.
> proxy-etr {
> address = 217.8.98.42
> priority = 0
> weight = 0
> }
> proxy-etr {
> address = 193.162.145.46
> priority = 0
> weight = 0
> }
>
> # IPv4 / IPv6 EID of the node.
> # eid-prefix: EID prefix (ip-prefix/mask) of the mapping
> # iid: Instance ID associated to the EID. When using VXLAN-GPE, iid
> configures
> # the VNI of the mapping. [0-16777215]
> # Two types of RLOCs can be defined:
> # rloc-address: Specifies directly the RLOC of the interface
> # address: It could be one of the following cases
> # - IPv4 or IPv6 address of the RLOC. Address should exist and
> # be assigned to an UP interface during startup process otherwise
> # it is discarded.
> # - ELP name
> # rloc-iface: Specifies the interface associated with the RLOC
> # interface: interface containing the RLOCs associated to this
> mapping
> # ip_version: 4 to use the IPv4 address of the interface and 6 to
> use the IPv6
> # address of the interface
> # Both types of RLOCs use priority and weight
> # priority [0-255]: Priority for the RLOC of the interface. Locators
> # with lower values are more preferable. This is used for both
> incoming
> # policy announcements and outgoing traffic policy management.
> # weight [0-255]: When priorities are the same for multiple RLOCs,
> the weight
> # indicates how to balance unicast traffic between them.
>
> database-mapping {
> eid-prefix = 153.16.57.128/28
> iid = 0
> rloc-address {
> address = 10.1.1.145
> priority = 0
> weight = 0
> }
> # rloc-iface{
> # interface = eth0
> # ip_version = 4
> # priority = 1
> # weight = 1
> # }
> }
>
> # Current LISP beta-network (lisp4.net/lisp6.net
> <http://lisp4.net/lisp6.net>) PITR addresses
> # Uncomment the IPv4 or IPv6 list based on your current locators and
> # comment the previous 'proxy-itrs' section
>
>
> proxy-itrs = {
> # LISP beta-network IPv4 PITRs
> # 69.31.31.98, # eqx-ash-pxtr
> # 149.20.48.60, # isc-pxtr
> # 198.6.255.37, # asp-pxtr
> # 173.36.193.25, # sjc-pxtr
> # 129.250.1.63, # ntt-amer-pxtr
> 217.8.98.33, # intouch-pxtr-1
> # 217.8.98.35, # intouch-pxtr-2
> # 193.162.145.46, # tdc-pxtr
> # 158.38.1.92, # uninett-pxtr
> # 203.181.249.172, # apan-pxtr
> # 202.51.247.10 # sg-nus-pxtr
> # LISP beta-network IPv6 PITRs
> # 2001:590::451f:1f62, # eqx-ash-pxtr
> # 2001:4f8:3:d::60, # isc-pxtr
> # 2001:418:4:1:deaf:bebe::10d, # asp-pxtr
> # 2001:418:0:1000::613, # ntt-amer-pxtr
> # 2001:200:e000:17::17, # intouch-pxtr-1
> # 2001:67C:21B4:108::b, # intouch-pxtr-2
> # 2001:6c8:41:100:0:2:1:c, # tdc-pxtr
> # 2001:700:0:52E::4, # uninett-pxtr
> # 2001:67C:21B4:107::b # apan-pxtr
> }
> ###############################################
>
>
>
> #################
> lisp startup in debug 3
> #########################
> oor
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] INFO: Open Overlay Router v1.1 compiled for Linux
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] WARNING: Rights: Effective [12288] Permitted [12288]
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] CRIT: pid_file_create: Error creating PID file:
> Permission denied
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] INFO: Building address to interface hash table
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] INFO: Control created!
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] INFO: Log level: High Debug
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Creating map cache and local mapping database
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: Creating mdb...
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: Creating mdb...
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: lisp_addr_get_ip_pref_addr: Not
> applicable to ip addressess
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Finished Constructing xTR
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] INFO: Device working in mode xTR registering with
> control
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: nat_set_xTR_ID: xTR_ID initialiazed with
> value: 94da00000000922952a79b884226a158
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: NAT support enabled. Set defaul RLOC to
> IPv4 family
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: RLOC Probing Interval: 30
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: The server 217.8.98.42 has been added to
> the list
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Added 217.8.98.42 to map-resolver list
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Added 217.8.98.42 to map-server list
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_get_locators_with_afi: List for
> OOR AFI 1 and afi 2 not yet created
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_add_locator: Added locator
> 217.8.98.42 to the mapping with EID 0.0.0.0/32.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Added 217.8.98.42 to proxy-etr list
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_add_locator: Added locator
> 193.162.145.46 to the mapping with EID 0.0.0.0/32.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Added 193.162.145.46 to proxy-etr list
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Balancing locator vector for 0.0.0.0/32:
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 locators vector (2 locators):
> 217.8.98.42 193.162.145.46
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 & IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: The server 217.8.98.33 has been added to
> the list
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Added 217.8.98.33 to proxy-itr list
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: Adding interface eth0 with index 2 to
> iface list
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: Interface eth0 with index 2 added to
> interfaces lists
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: open_ip_raw_socket: open socket 5 with afi: 2
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: bind_socket: Binded socket 5 to source
> address 10.1.1.145 and port 0 with afi 2
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: add_rule: Add rule -> Send packets with
> source address 10.1.1.145 and destination address _NULL_ to the table
> 2 with priority 2.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: parse_rloc_address: Locator stucture
> created:
> 10.1.1.145, Up, 0/0, 255/0
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_get_locators_with_afi: List for
> OOR AFI 1 and afi 2 not yet created
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_get_locators_with_afi: List for
> OOR AFI 1 and afi 2 not yet created
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_add_locator: Added locator
> 10.1.1.145 to the mapping with EID 153.16.57.128/28.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Balancing locator vector for 153.16.57.128/28:
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 locators vector (1 locators):
> 10.1.1.145
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 & IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: Couldn't find mapping for EID
> 153.16.57.128/28 in local mappings database
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: _add_ippref_entry: Added map cache data
> for 153.16.57.128/28
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: mdb_add_entry: inserted 153.16.57.128/28
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Added EID prefix 153.16.57.128/28 in the
> database.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: Configuring data plane
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: TUN/TAP ifindex is: 6
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: TUN/TAP mtu set to 1440
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: Tunnel fd at creation is 6
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: TUN interface UP.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: add_route: added route to the system: src
> addr: -, dst prefix:-, gw: -, table: 100
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: add_route: added route to the system: src
> addr: -, dst prefix:-, gw: -, table: 100
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: open_udp_raw_socket: Created socket 7
> associated to IPv4 addresses
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: open_udp_datagram_socket: Created socket
> 8 associated to IPv4 addresses
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: bind_socket: Binded socket 8 to source
> address _NULL_ and port 4341 with afi 2
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: Default IPv4 data iface eth0: 10.1.1.145
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Data plane initialized
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: open_udp_datagram_socket: Created socket
> 9 associated to IPv4 addresses
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: bind_socket: Binded socket 9 to source
> address _NULL_ and port 4342 with afi 2
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: Default IPv4 control iface eth0: 10.1.1.145
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Control initialized
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: tun_update_route: Process new gateway
> associated to the interface eth0: 10.1.1.1
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: add_route: added route to the system: src
> addr: -, dst prefix:-, gw: 10.1.1.1, table: 2
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: xtr_if_event: Reconfiguring Info Request
> process for locator 10.1.1.145 of the mapping 153.16.57.128/28.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: xtr_if_event: Reconfiguring Info Request
> process for locator 10.1.1.145 of the mapping 153.16.57.128/28.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: process_nl_new_unicast_route: the netlink
> message is not for any interface associated with RLOCs (eth1)
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: process_nl_new_unicast_route: the netlink
> message is not for any interface associated with RLOCs (eth1)
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: process_nl_new_unicast_route: Default RLOC
> afi defined (-a #): Skipped route with destination address IPv6 in
> iface eth0
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: =>process_netlink_msg: Received new route
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG:
> Starting xTR ...
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Balancing locator vector for 0.0.0.0/32:
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 locators vector (2 locators):
> 217.8.98.42 193.162.145.46
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 & IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] INFO: NAT aware on -> No Map Resolver will be used.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] INFO: NAT aware on -> disabling RLOC Probing
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: locators_classify_in_4_6: No locators to
> classify for mapping with eid 0.0.0.0/32
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Balancing locator vector for 0.0.0.0/32:
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 & IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: ****** Summary of the xTR configuration ******
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: ****************** LISP Local Mappings
> ****************
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: EID: 153.16.57.128/28, ttl: 10, loc-count:
> 1, action: no-action, auth: 1
> RLOC: 10.1.1.145, Up, 0/0, 255/0
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG:
> *******************************************************
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: **************** LISP Mapping Cache
> ******************
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG:
> *******************************************************
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: ******************* Map-Servers list
> ********************************
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: | Locator (RLOC) |
> Key Type |
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: | 217.8.98.42 | HMAC-SHA-1-96 |
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: ************* Map Resolvers ***************
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: ************************* Proxy ETRs List
> ****************************
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: | Locator (RLOC) |
> Status | Priority/Weight |
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: ************* Proxy-ITRs ***************
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: [1] => 217.8.98.33
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: add_rule: Add rule -> Send packets with
> source address 153.16.57.128/28 and destination address _NULL_ to the
> table 100 with priority 100.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: add_rule: Add rule -> Send packets with
> source address _NULL_ and destination address 153.16.57.128/28 to the
> table 254 with priority 99.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Balancing locator vector for 153.16.57.128/28:
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 locators vector (1 locators):
> 10.1.1.145
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 & IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Sent Info Request for mapping
> 153.16.57.128/28 to 217.8.98.42 from locator 10.1.1.145
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: *Info Request* -> nonce c47694a07ff3feec,
> EID: 153.16.57.128/28, MS: 217.8.98.42
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 10.1.1.145 ->
> 217.8.98.42 UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] INFO:
>
> Open Overlay Router (v1.1): started...
>
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: OOR_API: zmq_ctx_new errno: Success
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: OOR_API: zmq_socket: Success
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: OOR_API: API server initiated using ZMQ
>
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Received *Info Reply* -> nonce
> c47694a07ff3feec, IP: 217.8.98.42 -> 10.1.1.145, UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_add_locator: Added locator
> 158.38.1.92 to the mapping with EID 153.16.57.128/28.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Balancing locator vector for 153.16.57.128/28:
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 locators vector (1 locators):
> 10.1.1.145
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 & IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_get_locators_with_afi: List for
> OOR AFI 1 and afi 2 not yet created
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_add_locator: Added locator
> 158.38.1.92 to the mapping with EID 0.0.0.0/32.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Balancing locator vector for 0.0.0.0/32:
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 locators vector (1 locators):
> 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: IPv4 & IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: *ECM* -> flags:s, inner IP: 10.1.1.145 ->
> 217.8.98.42, inner UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: *Map-Register* -> flags:PIRM record-count:
> 1 nonce 552eaa07fefdaed, Inner IP: 10.1.1.145 -> 217.8.98.42, EID:
> 153.16.57.128/28, RTR: 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 10.1.1.145 ->
> 158.38.1.92 UDP: 4341 -> 4342
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Sent Encap Map-Register for mapping
> 153.16.57.128/28 to MS 217.8.98.42 from RLOC 10.1.1.145 through RTR
> 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Info Request of 153.16.57.128/28 to
> 217.8.98.42 from locator 10.1.1.145 programmed in 30 minutes.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: xTR: Completed processing of LISP control
> message
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: INPUT (4341): Inner IP: 158.38.1.92 ->
> 10.1.1.145
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Received *Map-Notify*-> flags:IR,
> record-count: 1, nonce 552EAA07FEFDAED, IP: 158.38.1.92 -> 10.1.1.145,
> UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Received Data Map Notify
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Mapping-record -> ttl: 10 loc-count: 2
> action: no-action auth: 0 map-version: 0 eid: 153.16.57.128/28
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Locator-record -> flags: L=0,p=0,R=0,
> p/w: 0/0 255/0, addr: 10.1.1.145
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Locator-record -> flags: L=0,p=0,R=1,
> p/w: 1/100 255/0, addr: 158.38.1.92
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_get_locators_with_afi: List for
> OOR AFI 1 and afi 2 not yet created
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_add_locator: Added locator
> 158.38.1.92 to the mapping with EID 153.16.57.128/28.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-2: mapping_add_locator: Added locator
> 10.1.1.145 to the mapping with EID 153.16.57.128/28.
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG: Map-Notify message confirms correct
> registration of 153.16.57.128/28.Programing next Map-Register in 60
> seconds
> [2016/9/22 12:4:56] DEBUG-3: xTR: Completed processing of LISP control
> message
>
>
> ^C[2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG: Terminal interrupt. Cleaning up...
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG-2: Exit Cleanup
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG: del_rule: Removed rule for source routing
> of src addr: 153.16.57.128/28
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG: del_rule: Removed rule for source routing
> of src addr: _NULL_
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG: xTR device destroyed
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG: Freed xTR ...
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG: Lisp controler destroyed
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG: del_route: deleted route from the system:
> src addr: -, dst prefix:-, gw: 10.1.1.1, table: 2
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG: del_rule: Removed rule for source routing
> of src addr: 10.1.1.145
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG: Sockets closed
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] DEBUG: Destroying lmtimers ...
> [2016/9/22 12:4:58] INFO: Exiting ...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openoverlayrouter.org
> http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20160923/ce5d400a/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list