[OOR-Users] Prefix expiration dropping traffic
Albert López
alopez at ac.upc.edu
Fri Jun 9 09:34:07 CEST 2017
Dear José,
The expiration time is defined by TTL. This is a hard coded parameter
that is defined by DEFAULT_DATA_CACHE_TTL (defs.h) and is used in
mapping_record_init_hdr(lisp_message_fields.c) . We usually set this
value to 10 (10 minutes). I don't know why you have 1, may be I sent to
you a testing version. In a future we would like to add this parameter
in the configuration file but we don't have it yet.
Best regards
Albert
El 09/06/17 a les 00:08, José Miguel Guzmán ha escrit:
> Hi All
>
> We realized that every minute, we are dropping traffic packets due to
> expiration of the destination prefix, and time required to update the
> entry form server (couple of seconds)
>
> *[2017/6/8 18:53:48] DEBUG: Got expiration for EID 192.168.102.0/24
> <http://192.168.102.0/24>*
> *[2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: No map cache for EID 192.168.102.168.
> Sending Map-Request!
> *
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG-2: lisp_addr_get_ip_pref_addr: Not
> applicable to ip addressess
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: Balancing locator vector for
> 192.168.102.168/32 <http://192.168.102.168/32>:
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: IPv4 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: IPv4 & IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: locators for req: 172.16.60.8
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: Map-Request->
> flags:a=0,m=0,p=0,s=0,P=0,S=0, irc: 0 (+1), record-count: 1, nonce:
> 78627d755, itr-rlocs:172.16.60.8, src-eid: 192.168.101.1, req-eid:
> 192.168.102.168/32 <http://192.168.102.168/32>
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG-2: lisp_addr_get_ip_addr: Not applicable to
> prefixes
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: ECM -> flags:s, inner IP: 192.168.101.1 ->
> 192.168.102.168/32 <http://192.168.102.168/32>, inner UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: Sent control message IP: 172.16.60.8 ->
> 172.16.60.194 UDP: 4342 -> 4342
> *[2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: Received Map-Reply-> flags:P=0,E=0,S=0,
> record-count: 1, nonce: 78627d75597fe77d, IP: 192.168.123.75 ->
> 172.16.60.8, UDP: 4342 -> 4342*
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: Mapping-record -> ttl: 1 loc-count: 1
> action: no-action auth: 0 map-version: 0 eid: 192.168.102.0/24
> <http://192.168.102.0/24>
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: Locator-record -> flags: L=1,p=0,R=1, p/w:
> 1/100 255/0, addr: 172.16.60.9
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG-2: mapping_get_locators_with_afi: List for
> OOR AFI 1 and afi 2 not yet created
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG-2: mapping_add_locator: Added locator
> 172.16.60.9 to the mapping with EID 192.168.102.0/24
> <http://192.168.102.0/24>.
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG-2: mapping_get_locators_with_afi: List for
> OOR AFI 3 and afi 10 not yet created
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: Balancing locator vector for
> 192.168.102.0/24 <http://192.168.102.0/24>:
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: IPv4 locators vector (1 locators):
> 172.16.60.9
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: IPv4 & IPv6 locators vector (0 locators):
> *[2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG: The map cache entry of EID
> 192.168.102.0/24 <http://192.168.102.0/24> will expire in 1 minutes.*
> [2017/6/8 18:53:49] DEBUG-2: Programming probing of EID's
> 192.168.102.0/24 <http://192.168.102.0/24> locator 172.16.60.9 (30
> seconds)
>
> I am not sure if I am doing something wrong.. (probably :))
>
> Is there any way to handle this transparently? For instance, have xTR
> refreshing prefixes 5secs before expiration, so, traffic is not
> interrupted?
> Are these expiration timers, configurable? I only see
> that rloc-probing timers are tunable.
>
> Thanks!
> JM
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *José Miguel Guzmán
> *Senior Network Consultant
> Latin America & Caribbean
>
> +1 (650) 248-2490 <tel:+16502482490>
> +56 (9) 9064-2780 <tel:+56990642780>
>
> jmguzman at whitestack.com <mailto:jmguzman at whitestack.com>
>
> jmguzmanc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.openoverlayrouter.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20170609/4ed2665d/attachment.html>
More information about the Users
mailing list